<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Rules of (Dis)engagement</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.justamonth.com/2009/01/31/the-rules-of-disengagement/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.justamonth.com/2009/01/31/the-rules-of-disengagement/</link>
	<description>One Resolution a Month for a Year</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 25 Mar 2009 14:50:01 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Walden, this is not &#187; Just a Month</title>
		<link>http://www.justamonth.com/2009/01/31/the-rules-of-disengagement/comment-page-1/#comment-32</link>
		<dc:creator>Walden, this is not &#187; Just a Month</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Feb 2009 05:06:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.justamonth.com/?p=167#comment-32</guid>
		<description>[...] increasingly I&#8217;ve begun to get the feeling that my caveat-filled list of rules is a little unfair. I&#8217;m replacing electronic media indulgences with other media indulgences [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] increasingly I&#8217;ve begun to get the feeling that my caveat-filled list of rules is a little unfair. I&#8217;m replacing electronic media indulgences with other media indulgences [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dandennis</title>
		<link>http://www.justamonth.com/2009/01/31/the-rules-of-disengagement/comment-page-1/#comment-27</link>
		<dc:creator>dandennis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Feb 2009 16:56:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.justamonth.com/?p=167#comment-27</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m allowing myself to contribute to twitter, and facebook (status updates via twitter, as well as sharing notes). I&#039;ve got my Facebook messages emailed to me, so I have a way of checking on those without getting into facebook. But twitter may be harder. Maybe I&#039;ll just cut out twitter reading altogether. Maybe social web is harder to cut off from, because it&#039;s inherently collaborative and based on call and response. Does that sound right?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m allowing myself to contribute to twitter, and facebook (status updates via twitter, as well as sharing notes). I&#8217;ve got my Facebook messages emailed to me, so I have a way of checking on those without getting into facebook. But twitter may be harder. Maybe I&#8217;ll just cut out twitter reading altogether. Maybe social web is harder to cut off from, because it&#8217;s inherently collaborative and based on call and response. Does that sound right?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: lokman</title>
		<link>http://www.justamonth.com/2009/01/31/the-rules-of-disengagement/comment-page-1/#comment-26</link>
		<dc:creator>lokman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Feb 2009 05:16:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.justamonth.com/?p=167#comment-26</guid>
		<description>what does &quot;facebook and twitter only for output&quot; mean? as in, you can only write but not read from it? but how can you tell whether a message is vital if you don&#039;t read it?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>what does &#8220;facebook and twitter only for output&#8221; mean? as in, you can only write but not read from it? but how can you tell whether a message is vital if you don&#8217;t read it?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
